At
Cavin-Morris Gallery in Chelsea, two wooden ships can be found
stationed on a large white pedestal. “The Madjet,” with its curving
stern and sculptural ornaments raised high like royal standards, easily
conjures associations with ancient Egypt, with the sleek vessels
depicted ferrying deities up and down the Nile. Yet with its metal
fastenings, its projecting rudder, and its crisscrossing assemblage of
sticks, strings, screws, and woodchips, there is a machinelike quality
about the Madjet. Absent of human operators, the ship is animated
instead by a force unseen, an energy that gathers its parts and holds
them in a dynamic, buzzing tension. “I always try to make everything I
do move,” the sculptor Kevin Sampson told me later. “The Kron-Printzen,”
also on display at Cavin-Morris,
offers another vibrant bricolage of wood and metal scraps, painted
rope, iridescent beads, and other vaguely discernible elements,
synthesized into a ghostly, two-masted ship. Named after an
eighteenth-century Dutch slaver that sank at sea, entombing hundreds of
Africans in an underwater grave, Sampson’s Kron-Printzen is layered with
histories as diverse as its materials.
“The Kron-Printzen,” Wood, Metal, String, and Found Materials, 26″ x 27″ x 12″, 2014. Image courtesy of Cavin-Morris Gallery.
These
were the first of Sampson’s sculptures I had encountered. At the time, I
had only corresponded over e-mail with the artist. Knowing little else
about Sampson aside from the fact that he was formerly a police officer
and, at any given time, a very busy man, I studied the two ships on
display and felt a swell of curiosity about the artist I had yet to
meet, about what fascinating combination of grand and personal
narratives threaded through these works.
When I asked the gallery
attendants at Cavin-Morris what they knew about Sampson, they
immediately lit up. They touched and handled Sampson’s sculptures as
they spoke about them, treating them not as precious artifacts but as
objects that incited direct engagement. One, whose name was Marissa,
remarked on how Sampson’s pieces are more robust than they might appear.
His strung-up, cement-filled, and screwed-together compositions always
made the journey from studio to exhibition space fully intact. As I drew
closer to the ships, Marissa explained how she could recognize a
system, a unique vocabulary and syntax, in each of Sampson’s sculptures.
However chaotic and freeform they may appear at a glance, their
interlocking wood pieces, well-placed screws, and assiduous dabs of
paint give the sculptures a sense of cohesion. Each individual artwork
manages to absorb the torrent of snapped twigs, fraying ropes, and
bleached chicken bones, the anomalous furniture knobs and jewelry pieces
that appear inexplicably fused into their new contexts. These
repurposed materials never completely lose their definition, revealing
their tangled past lives in vague but visceral flashes.
“St. John,” Mixed Media, 34″ x 18″ x 19″, Mixed Media, 2005. Image courtesy of Cavin-Morris Gallery.
It
was a chilly January afternoon when Sampson and I finally found time
for a studio visit. Sampson, 61, is a father of three. With the untimely
passing of his wife, he raised his children mostly on his own. To this
day Sampson, a recent grandfather and a teacher at schools and art
institutions, radiates parental love and attentiveness. Days, hours, and
minutes before our meeting, he sent instructions on how to get to his
Newark apartment from Manhattan, proposing at the last minute to meet me
at Newark Penn Station where my train would arrive. When I stepped out
of the exit he had specified, Sampson, dressed solemnly in a black
jacket and a charcoal gray fedora, met my eyes with his. His mouth,
tightly sealed and framed in thick, trimmed strokes of facial hair,
opened into a smile. He greeted me with a jovial handshake, and I could
recognize in an instant the charismatic warmth I had sensed in our
correspondence, as well as the melancholy of his art, the dreaminess
that seems inextricable from a familiarity with hardship and pain.
“I’ve
been here over 20 years, and I still don’t feel like I’m Newark,”
Sampson told me as we walked from the train station to his apartment and
studio a few blocks away. We were in the Ironbound neighborhood, a
community of mostly Portuguese and Brazilian immigrants that weathered
the boom and bust of industrial growth as well as the riots that swept
through Newark in 1967. As a widower, Sampson chose to relocate his
family to the Ironbound from Englishtown, New Jersey in the early 1990s,
leaving suburban living for a less conventional residence in an
artists’ colony that occupied an old factory space. Sampson had decided
to leave law enforcement to pursue art full-time. With a long career as a
composite sketch artist, he studied illustration at the Newark School
of Fine and Industrial Arts — soon teaching there — and took classes at
Parsons School of Design and the Art Students League in New York. The
pen and ink illustrations he showed me are arresting, many resembling
poster and mural designs, with their animated lines of text and
whimsical, often eerie, imagery of faces and machines. Sampson has in
fact worked on a number of publicly commissioned murals in the area.
“The Madjet,” Wood, Metal, String, and Found Materials, 27″ x 25″ x 8″, 2015. Image courtesy of Cavin-Morris Gallery.
But
Sampson prefers working with three-dimensional media. While
illustration, for him, requires prolonged contemplation, sculpture has a
spontaneity that currently holds greater appeal for Sampson. “I’m a
total process-oriented artist,” he told me. In this sense, art and life
seem inseparable for the sculptor, who considers his time spent watching
the news (“before CNN got so bad”), walking down the street, talking to
people, and collecting discarded objects, to be part of one continuous
artistic act. With his ships, Sampson will often build a basic framework
for each vessel with materials from a hardware store and then set off
on an Odyssean journey around the neighborhood to collect the
centerpieces and accessories for his vessels. Sampson has often felt
predestined to find the things he finds. When asked how his sculptures
are made, he responds by saying they were made “out there,” out in the
world beyond his studio, where he has often chanced upon exactly the
objects and conversations he had been searching for. “I remember
something Randall Morris said that really stuck with me,” Sampson
recalled of the cofounder of Cavin-Morris Gallery and an early supporter
of his work. “He said that artists like me live with their work.”
Sampson
currently lives in an open, second-story space above a large Brazilian
restaurant. He built the interior himself, starting with an empty,
stripped-down shell. Over the years, his residence has filled up with
created, inherited, acquired, and found objects. The first large room
hums with the rhythms and melodies of Sampson’s own sculptures. Other
seafaring vessels — including the satirical “U.S.S. Sarah Palin,”
bedizened with toy figurines like a nightmarish parade float — can be
seen alongside Sampson’s earlier works, his polychromatic, modified
musical instruments as well as the shrine-like memorials to friends,
family, and loved ones. Sampson had initially turned to sculpture as a
private activity, a means of dealing with personal tragedies as well as
the impact and aftermath of the AIDS and drug epidemics in the 80s and
early 90s. Now, when Sampson’s sculptures are not being displayed in
galleries and museums, many of them hang on the walls or sit on the
floors and tables of his apartment, where they commingle with a sundry
collection of busts, statuettes, icons, and dolls.
“Them Twins,” Mixed Media, 20″ x 29″ x 15″, 2002. Image courtesy of Cavin-Morris Gallery.
“Them Twins” (detail).
Sampson
apologized several times in advance for the “total mess” in his
apartment. His tone, however, was more playful than apologetic. Implicit
was a respect for his way of working, of finding meaning amid apparent
disorder. Indeed, his apartment reverberates with a contained chaos.
Nothing feels superfluous, nor essential or permanent. Objects glow with
the potential for use and change, from the wall of books slightly
obscured by larger artworks by Sampson’s friends, to the boxes of
cleaned chicken bones for his sculptures, to the jars of homemade
pickles on the kitchen counter, repeatedly replenished for friends,
family, and current and former students that regularly come through
Sampson’s home. Sampson is clearly a dedicated father, grandfather, and
community organizer, effortlessly adopting the traits of his own father,
who was a prominent civil rights leader. A photograph of Stephen
Sampson at a demonstration hangs by the door to his apartment.
“I
was the black sheep — or white sheep — of the family,” Sampson joked.
His father, a Sunday school teacher and independent scholar of black
history, wanted his children to be well-educated and empowered members
of their communities. Unable to identify a career path early on, the
young Sampson devoted himself to law enforcement because he had to “do
something.” Though he made bold decisions and concerted efforts to shift
his focus to art, Sampson expressed that his recognition as an
exhibited artist seems to him almost incidental. He still thinks little
of his success as an artist, despite having often found himself in the
company of elite politicians, artists, actors, and other members of what
seemed a distant world. “I came into the art world after Basquiat,
Keith Haring, all the drug addicts. I think the galleries and the
museums were just happy to have a functional person,” Sampson said,
chuckling at himself. “I still feel more policeman than artist.”
Gilbert Hsiao, 58, has bounced among various studios, from Berlin to
the concrete shell of a defunct oil tank in Brooklyn before landing
space in downtown Newark, New Jersey, where he now paints his colorful,
geometric art pieces.
Once overlooked as an art destination and better known for its 1967
riots and urban decay, Newark’s downtown hosts a growing visual arts
scene that has attracted outsiders like Hsiao with cheap rent, good
public transportation and a constellation of cutting-edge galleries that
have garnered outsize praise. There are more than a dozen art galleries
in Newark in addition to spaces that double as coffee shops or beauty
parlors.
But as these newcomers increasingly flock to Newark, some older
artists — many of whom are black and are longtime residents — are
feeling overlooked, especially as a few gallery owners and artists who
are relatively recent arrivals have snagged prime real estate. Tension
within the visual arts community is brewing as the downtown area is
poised for gentrification. New, luxury apartments are for rent, upscale
cafes and restaurants are coming soon, and a Whole Foods is slated to
open in a few years.
“There a lot of whites coming into Newark now,” said Kevin Sampson,
59, a black artist known for his elaborate sculptures made of found
objects. A resident since 1993 who has been involved in the city’s art
scene longer than that, Sampson has led the debate on Newark’s older
artists versus its newcomers, whom he describes as “carpetbaggers” and
“white hipster refugees from Brooklyn.”
Sampson wants the new artists and gallery owners to pay their dues
and respect the history of the artists who have been in the city for
years or decades. He said a few galleries and artists have received
space for free or at reduced rents and bluntly described it as white
privilege.
“They use privilege to set something up,” he said. “They are getting free buildings. Its landowners say they trust you.”
Bisa Washington, a 63-year-old Newark resident and artist who has
been involved in the art scene since the 1970s, agrees with Sampson.
“It was a question of access,” she said. “You look around, and you
wonder how these things are happening, why the artists who are already
here weren’t pulled into that loop.”
Sampson said he plans to hold a round table on the topic in the fall.
You
look around, and you wonder how these things are happening, why the
artists who are already here weren’t pulled into that loop.
Bisa Washington
Newark artist
Kevin Sampson, 59, is
an artist known for making elaborate sculptures out of found objects. He
has lived in Newark for more than 20 years.
Sharon Adarlo
Rebecca Jampol is the owner and one of the
founders of Solo(s) Project House, an art gallery in downtown Newark
that rents its space. She’s also a founder of the Gateway Project, a
series of pop-up exhibitions at the Gateway Center, a commercial complex
adjacent to Newark Pennsylvania Station. C&K Properties, a real
estate company, donated the space for the Gateway Project.
“My interactions with all the older artists who have been here a
longer time have always been positive,” Jampol said. She added that she
acknowledges the groundwork they’ve laid and is aware of the criticisms
lobbed by Sampson and others.
“I am here the same reason they are here,” she said. “To indulge in a city that has a lot of inspiration.”
Evonne Davis, a founder of Gallery Aferro in downtown Newark, where
Hsiao works, swatted away criticism that she, as a white woman, was
favored for free space. The RBH Group, a major real estate developer in
the city, donated space for the gallery after she and her partner, Emma
Wilcox, had started another gallery, she said.
“We have already proven we got it done,” she said. “The idea we got
the space for any other reason than hard work is, frankly, insulting.”
Davis said she and Wilcox work hard to pay the gallery’s hefty heat
and electricity bills by selling work, fundraising and working other
jobs. Davis said she does not get a salary running the gallery and works
as a consultant, art handler and photographer.
“We are not above criticism. We are not perfect,” she said. “We try hard to be part of the solution, not part of problem.”
Gallery Aferro has shown many works by local artists, including well
known Newark artist and performer Jerry Gant, who recently had a large
solo show. The Gateway Center has shown Sampson’s work.
“This tension is long-standing,” said Clement Price, a history
professor at Rutgers University. “There has always been an
insider-outsider dynamic.”
Price says tension within the arts community was also revealed when
the New Jersey Performing Arts Center opened in 1997. Critics, he said,
believed “NJPAC was a larger plot to bring whites back into city.”
Redevelopment has accelerated in recent years, and Hsiao says Newark
is an increasingly attractive option as people are pushed out of
Manhattan, Brooklyn and Jersey City, which has a vibrant arts community
and faces increasing gentrification too.
At least one longtime Newark artist applauds the changes.
“I feel really good about it,” said visual artist Gladys Grauer, who
at the age of 90 is considered the godmother of the city’s art scene.
“There are so many artists now.”
Grauer, a black artist, has watched the city evolve since she moved
there in the early 1950s. In 1972 she opened the Aard Gallery, the first
art gallery in the city since the Great Depression and the only local
place for visual expression besides the Newark Museum, she said. It was
in the city’s South Ward, where she currently resides.
The arts community grew as galleries like City Without Walls (1975)
and Aljira (1983) were founded, both fixtures in the city. The nonprofit
Newark Arts Council formed in 1981 and has promoted artists ever since
with open studio events and other programs.
Grauer said the more recent arrivals over the past 15 years have
established themselves in Newark rather than coming and going, as they
did in the past.
“People started to think there was something great here,” she said.
“[Artists] were looking to seek their fortune in New York. They are now
seeking their fortune here, which I think is excellent. They want to
stay here and work.”
I once asked an art dealer how he determined whether someone was an outsider artist, and he offered this criterion: anyone who called up and said he or she was an outsider artist was immediately disqualified. In his view, outsider artists don’t self-identify and they don’t operate telephones.
Standing inside the 19th annual Outsider Art Fair at 7 West 34th Street in Manhattan on Thursday evening, Colin Rhodes, an Australian art historian who’s written a book on the subject, disagreed. “Pathology is not the defining criterion,” he said. For him, an outsider artist is not an amateur, just someone working outside the regular art world structures.
In any case, the mentally ill, the developmentally disabled and the self-taught generally rule the field — the dearth of art by prisoners at these fairs is a continual surprise; they’re an extremely creative, productive and expanding population — and their stories haunt wall labels throughout the 33 exhibitors’ booths. But this is a strong fair whose work begs to be considered along other lines.
There are, for instance, pieces characterized by striking or unusual materials, like Jim Work’s drawings of farms and rural roads done in crayon on opened-up paper grocery bags, at the Pardee Collection; or George Paterson’s carved skateboards, which look like tribal objects, at Cavin-Morris. David Butler’s cut-and-pounded-tin birds and creatures, on view at Gilley’s Gallery and Ricco/Maresca, were made to decorate his yard in New Orleans or hang in his windows, casting distinctive shadows into the interior of his home.
Outsider art also accommodates the late bloomer. Aaron Birnbaum, a retired New York tailor, started painting at 65. His lovely “Two Peacocks in Tree” from 1985 at Maxwell Projects is framed by painted pieces of a wooden crib found in the street. Giorgos Rigas began painting scenes of the Greek countryside from memory at 56. His Grandma Moses-like canvases are hung salon-style at C. Grimaldis.
Religious visionaries are a perennial presence. Nikifor at Wasserwerk Galerie Lange created small, beautifully colored images, including a self-portrait as a Greek Orthodox bishop. The legendary Howard Finster offers an urgent pronouncement at Ames Gallery — “Warning! Take Heed or Fail!” — from 1984.
And pathology can’t always be ruled out. Some of the best works in the show were made by artists afflicted with something — although institutional records often prohibit us from knowing what. William Rice Rode, a patient in an Illinois mental hospital around the turn of the last century, made extraordinary drawings of flying machines, people and text written in a self-invented language, on bed sheets; examples are on view at the Carl Hammer Gallery.
At Ricco/Maresca, George Widener’s large ink-on-paper drawing “Untitled (4421)” from 2010 doubles as a “robot teaching game” for future generations of intelligent machines. The systematic structure, numbering and pattern are credited by his dealer largely to Mr. Widener’s being an autistic savant.
Some of the most widely admired work here is by the Electric Pencil, an anonymous patient at State Lunatic Asylum No. 3 in Nevada, Mo., whose drawings from the early 20th century were discovered in a trash can in 1970. Assembled and displayed by the New York artist Harris Diamant — who also provided the “electric” moniker — the Pencil’s drawings of animals and specter-eyed figures often appear on hospital stationery.
Established masters hang alongside newer discoveries. The old guard includes Bill Traylor, Martin Ramirez, Henry Darger, Mr. Butler, Sam Doyle, Mr. Finster, James Castle and Adolf Wolfli. Mr. Rode and the Electric Pencil are among the new.
And then there is the catchall category of general weirdness: illustrations made to accompany Dr. Carrie F. Young’s 1875 lectures on the effects of alcohol on the human stomach at Ames; Haitian voodoo objects at Bourbon-Lally, made to please spirits or protect households; the virtuoso ink drawings of Leonard L. St. Clair (a k a Stoney), a dwarf tattoo artist who lived in Columbus, Ohio, at Maxwell Projects.
Written next to the images in Mr. St. Clair’s drawings — which were made as tattoo samples — are numbers designating prices for the real things. He might be surprised to learn, 31 years after his death, that the drawings themselves have acquired financial value as art objects.
Perhaps more than any other factor, this is what binds together the work in the Outsider Art Fair: Much of it wasn’t created to sell, or to achieve, acclaim, but for other purposes — often merely to satisfy a raw creative impulse. For those of us caught up in the art world, it offers a corrective, or at least a temporary window into another world.
The Outsider Art Fair continues through Sunday at 7 West 34th Street, Manhattan;
sanfordsmith.com.
A version of this review appeared in print on February 12, 2011, on page C3 of the New York edition.
It was a inspirational day as hard as it tried not to be. I went up to the wall, and painted under that bridge. For some reason i feel quite at home, working in and on that wall with the deafening sounds of traveling trains.............. over head..
hiding from the sunlight
I came home full of vim and vigor and frantically searched for art.
I had a old plastic horse hanging from my ceiling..... and a tacky clock hanging on my wall.
So i snatched down the horse and cut off its head, with my old raggedy saw, then it fit perfectly, on the face of the clock, as I knew it would. I placed it on a wall that is covered with often failed attempts at painting................and it was home.
The wind of heaven is that which blows between a horse's ears. ~Arabian Proverb
If you're in London and still haven't seen Constructing Realities, then drop by Goodge Street or Warren Street tube station and head to at Phase 2 Gallery before the show closes. Julian Busch, Model from the project The Fortress of Senses Constructing Realities focuses on the best work from the Postgraduate Certificate Course in Advanced Architectural Research, at the Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL. The 9 research proposals investigate new types of place, novel interactive building elements, new façade and structural systems.
Architecture and engineering have a history where research and practice go hand in hand, where many great practices have grown as a result of fundamental research and where many research projects arise from groundbreaking design. This is especially true during periods of economic inactivity when recent modes of working are called into question and new modes (sometimes based on rediscovered historical precedent) are established. This can lead to the formation of innovative practices and to the start of academic careers in research and teaching.
The responsive installations, virtual environments, laser scanning drawings and prototypes presented in Constructing Realities are strikingly different from each other. I'm going to focus on a couple of them over the next few days. Ah! and before i forget, thanks a thousand times to RuairiGlynn for hooking me up with his graduates. Julian Busch's project The Fortress of Senses - Rescripting Landscapes was cryptic enough to keep me interested from the moment i saw it at the show opening right until this very moment. Fasten your seatbelt!
The project is set inside the Chateau de Maulnes, a hunting castle built in the 16th century in Burgundy, France. The Fortress of Senses is an inquiry into the spatial possibilities of reinterpreting the artefact as a field of events. The Theater
The corpse of a deer is brought into the space as a reworking of the concept of the chateau and its hunting functions. The kitchen, the great hall and the chandelier are key actors used for refracting and modelling a series of events that become components of the landscape stored in the chateau. In this context, the spaces become a series of events or reconstructions of an alternative chateau stored within the existing one. A theatre of stored events operating as other interior landscapes. Model (detail)
Drawings and modelling reconstruct the death of the deer as an event in the kitchen, a moment in the natural landscape. The Kitchen
Sections of deer refabricate the chandelier, which is rehung by the blacksmith as toolmaker and restorer of equipment.
The recompositions are stored in the great hall.
The dining room serves as a theatre of pieces between the architecture of the space and the event. It performs as a new landscape looking for the deer in the forest. The chandelier Can you describe the model you are showing in the exhibition "the Rainbow of Blood"? which part of the hunting narrative does it encapsulate? Julian Busch: The Project is roughly divided into 3 parts: the production, the storage and the performance of architectural objects/landscapes. The Rainbow of Blood is the first one of these reflexive interventions. It takes place in the kitchen where the venison is hung by the hunters.
A configuration of metal sheets, differently arranged, form the mould for varying landscape formations. A set of devices together with the microclimatic conditions within the kitchen create a rainbow of blood. Its mist lands on the metal sheets and is toasted by the sunlight that shines through the kitchen window, revealing new objects, artificial architecture topologies. Performing Landscapes Why did you chose that particular castle? Was the building the starting point of your project or did you have an idea in mind and were just looking for a suitable location?
When I started my research project I was interested in perception of spaces (former projects led to this interest). I quite soon found out about the chateau de Maulnes in France, as it is a demonstrative example of mannerist architecture.
One of the leitmotifs of the castle is the presentation of the five senses. It just seemed to be the perfect location for an architectural intervention. Could you point us to existing building, structures or projects that go in the same direction as The Fortress of Senses by simulating a narrative and 'theatralizing' events?
An example of what I think is highly motivating in that direction is the architecture of late Baroque. In storytelling paintings, frescoes and ornaments communicative spaces were created.
The Zwiefalten Abbey in southern Germany is such an Gesamtkunstwerk bringing together different forms of art. Zwiefalten, Germany: Ceiling painting in the main nave of the former abbey church, by Franz Joseph Spiegler (1751)
The Chateau de Maulnes itself is another good example. The detail of the principal cornice shows dogs heads between the consoles, indicating that this place is all about hunting! Thanks Julian!
The exhibition runs until October, 1st at PHASE 2 Gallery, 8 Fitzroy St, London W1T 4BJ (map.)
Related: Book Review: Digital Architecture - Passages Through Hinterlands.
It's official: There will be a second season to Bravo's reality series "Work of Art: The Next Great Artist."
Producers of the series announced Wednesday that they will be holding open casting calls later this month in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York. In the announcement, they said that like last season, the show is looking for people ranging from "recent art school graduates to artists with gallery representation and pieces in the permanent collections of internationally recognized museums."
The application form consists of 14 pages of questions that include everything from the applicants' education to their art-world experience to their thoughts on the current state of the international art scene. For Season 1, producers selected 14 artists to participate in the series. They have not specified how many contestants there will be for Season 2.
Magical Elves and Pretty Matches are returning as the production companies for the show. (The latter is run by Sarah Jessica Parker, who served as an executive producer on Season 1.)
No air date for Season 2 has been announced, though one can assume that it will kick off sometime in 2011.
For L.A.-area artists, "Work of Art" will be coming to the Patrick Painter gallery in Santa Monica's Bergamot Station for an open casting call on Sept. 19.
Organizers cautioned that people traveling to the casting calls from out of town should be aware that callbacks are the following day in each city, and that hopefuls will not know whether or not they have a callback the next day until as late as 10 p.m. the day of the open call.
Keep reading for more details on the open casting calls...
FOR Jan Green, the early 19th-century gristmill where she lives has been a muse and a refuge.
“I will never experience another building the way I have this one,” said Ms. Green, a painter whose dark, atmospheric work is inspired by the light on the surrounding landscape. “I paid attention to it, and it took care of me.”
Ms. Green, 56, shares the 4,500-square-foot home with her second husband, John Toroni, 60. She first saw it in 1976, when she and Bruce Dragoo, a boyfriend she met at the California Institute of the Arts, moved to Delaware County, N.Y., after graduation. To earn a living, Mr. Dragoo began doing carpentry and repair work for David and Bonnie Montgomery, the mill’s previous owners.
“It was covered with tar paper and was an absolute wreck,” Ms. Green said.
The Montgomerys eventually left to be closer to their antiques shop in Hudson, N.Y.; they sold the mill to Ms. Green for $50,000 in 1999.
Seated at an antique marble table in her open kitchen, she recalled the challenges involved in renovation, an ongoing project that has cost $325,000 to date.
When she moved in, she said, “I could see the sky through the metal roof on the second floor.” Now everything is double-insulated.
The foundation had problems as well, she said. “I invited 12 local men over, made an amazing dinner, and asked them each how they would fix it.” The solution came from Dale Kirby, a fourth-generation house mover who specializes in concrete foundations. Mr. Kirby stabilized the mill with a T-shaped form made of wood, and reinforced it with steel and concrete — all of it concealed underground to maintain the integrity of the original structure.
As for her gleaming floors, she said, “On hands and knees, I scrubbed for months each floor board until it was clean.”
Roger Cardinal, an architect who worked with Ms. Green on the interiors, remembered “literally a half-inch of dust and dirt encrusted on the floors.”
After they were spotless, Ms. Green used black tea to even out the discolorations.
Mr. Toroni, a teacher at the Jefferson Central School, traded labor with their contractor, Stuart Hamm, to save money. “As a way to lower the cost of building our deck, I painted all the windows in an old church for Stuart,” he said.
Mr. Toroni is also responsible for the gardening and landscaping, and for building and repairing the stone walls and steps.
And in an unusual twist, Mr. Dragoo, now 59 and an architectural designer in California, returned to supervise the renovation. (He and Ms. Green, who were together for 17 years and married for 2, are now best friends. “She’s my hero,” he said.)
Mr. Dragoo redesigned the facade, with 10-inch board siding, a 4-inch beveled batten on the top two stories and “a much heavier window surround,” he said, in keeping with the scale of the building.
Inside, he used old barn beams to construct the large bookshelf that serves as a room divider. He also added the trapdoor in the living room that opens to the space where the mill’s wheel once ran. That area is a wine cellar.
All the work they have put into the mill has its rewards — for Ms. Green, in particular.
“I live and work here 365 days a year,” she said. “And for eight months, it is dark and gray. I see huge icebergs in the stream, bobcats, bear, birds. Yet I feel safe and unthreatened, which is essential for me as an artist.”
A version of this article appeared in print on September 9, 2010, on page D5 of the New York edition.
JOHN DAVIS GALLERY, HUDSON, NEW YORK | JULY 22 – AUGUST 15, 2010
“Flesh,” Willem de Kooning famously said, “was the reason oil paint was invented.”
A down-to-earth artist if there ever was one, he recognized the corruptibility of flesh, and to represent it one needed a susceptible material. Not surprisingly, conventional practice and thinking focus on the radiant and beautiful. Always eager to believe in an illusion, society prefers works in which time’s pressure is given, at most, a passing nod. In fact, when it comes to the subject of time, it is worth bearing in mind that photographers get a free pass, while painters don’t. Take Nicholas Nixon, for example, who has stated that his photographs of the Brown sisters, babies, and the elderly are about the “life cycle.”
Brenda Goodman works in a narrower register, where shared experience is never the point. She neither evokes the “life cycle” nor situates her work in the social domain, particularly as dominated by the selling and consuming of glamour. Rather, she confronts the inevitable toll of daily life without becoming maudlin or portraying herself as a victim. In Loss (2009), a dead cat lies on its back near the middle of the painting’s bottom edge, its legs sticking straight, and its upside-down head staring out at the viewer. This cat is too stiff to have its tummy rubbed—the position is funny and horrifying, reminding me of the way a child employs an exaggerated pose to “play dead.” Only the cat isn’t playing and someone has to remove the body. We have to become intimate with death, which the paint’s tactility underscores. At the same time, she makes a startling equation between the dead cat and the painting; one can remove the corpse and painting (a tactile surface) from a room, but the memory of them, which is visceral, is harder to get rid of.
I suspect Goodman believes that oil paint was invented because of the vulnerable body, and, recognizing that pigments are historically derived from colored dirt, minerals, and biological sources, she always acknowledges that connection in her work. Her palette is dominated by earth tones. The crusty textures, accumulated patches of paint, and runny slicks evoke scarred flesh, decay, dissolution, and the detritus that gathers in anyone’s life. Beyond this, what I think Goodman wants to do, and yet knows is nearly impossible to do, is to make paint into something more than a synecdoche for the inchoate responses we muster in the face of time’s unavoidable devastations. That her work never comes across as stylish or reducible to a sign, which is the fate that has befallen Edvard Munch’s “The Scream” (1893), is one measure of how well she has succeeded. It also helps explain why she has flown under the radar for much of her career. We want to screen out the inevitable toll time will take, and prefer art that transports us away from ourselves.
There were a number of times when I kept looking because of the way Goodman handled the paint and simultaneously felt the urge to turn away for the very same reason. That tension was one of the many strengths of this powerful exhibition. This was not because the subject was shocking, but because it was familiar, even when I couldn’t name it, as in the paintings collectively titled “Troubled Waters.”
In “Troubled Waters 2” (2009), two forms seem to be facing each other. The pinkish one on the left, which is cropped by the painting’s edge, resembles the head of a sperm whale, while the other, blackish one has what appears to be a sutured scar running along where the mouth or belly might be, as well as a cluster of thick black ovals near its top edge, with thin red paint “bleeding” from the ovals that cascades down the form’s right side. “Troubled Waters 2” refuses to become a simple story which can be easily consumed and quickly dispensed with. Rather, the painting compels us to reflect upon what we are looking at, and consider, for example, its amorphous forms. Are they heads or bodies or, what I suspect, both? As both, it reminds us that the mind and body are inseparable, however much we might fantasize otherwise.
Goodman’s paintings run the gamut from abstraction to representation. In a number of untitled works, squid-like and embryonic forms jostle with linear nets and tentacle-like trails of paint. In others, such as “Self Portrait 9” (2005), Goodman depicts an elevated view of a heavy, close-cropped nude holding a brush and staring at her painting. The visual scale of the figure in relationship to nearby things (stretched canvases) and the painting’s physical size (50 by 36 inches) make the room feel immense without diminishing the nude’s physical presence. Formally, this is not an easy thing to do. This seems to be Goodman’s lifelong goal—to address the naked self.
Here, I would like to make a comparison between her work and Philip Guston’s late paintings, which Goodman acknowledges as an influence, because it reveals something about her singular achievement. Guston depicted heads with an oversized eye; hairy, gangly legs; feet; and hands, but not the torso. He wasn’t comfortable in his body. Goodman isn’t ashamed of her body, however, and depicts it from the front and back. Perhaps it’s time we recognize how much more daring a number of women artists are than their male contemporaries. I am thinking specifically of artists such as Goodman and Catherine Murphy, as well as Ellen Altfest, Katherine Bradford, Nicole Eisenman, Dana Schutz, and Amy Sillman, all of whom rejected the domain of glamour and media images that preoccupy much of the art world. For them, Andy Warhol was not a god in whose footsteps they needed to follow.